This contains the executable to bring Autodesk Simulation Moldflow Adviser 2013 Service Pack 1 or Autodesk Simulation MOldflow Adviser Multi-Language, up to Service Pack 2.
![]() Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Crack + Key Activator
The AutoCAD 2013 Crack improves upon 2012’s ability to create associative drawing views from any 3D model that can be opened or referenced by AutoCAD. And on top of this you can still do all the 2D drafting you always did!
If you haven’t seen the association yet, think about that inventor Fusion doesn’t accompany any tools to make drawings from 3D models. Also think about that inventor Fusion uses the DWG file format, and that Inventor 2013 will be able to open DWG model files directly. It’s crystal clear that AutoCAD is being created to become the Swiss Army knife of the Autodesk toolbox, bringing data in from any source and processing it into a DWG file that might be then be utilized by any of Autodesk’s different product.
Maybe AutoCAD 2013 Crack isn’t as good as some other tools for rendering, organic modelling, or finite element analysis, but if you have AutoCAD 2013 Crack you will be able to open, modify, and document 2D and 3D CAD models from nearly any source.
If this chameleon-like ability works out, this flexibility will surely make AutoCAD a ‘safe’ or go-to tool for any drafting office. I can’t help but feel that Autodesk are considering a similar model as ProE’s re-invention as Creo elements – but starting from the other direction.
What’s new in AutoCAD 2013?
The two really big new features are in model documentation and cloud computing, but there have been a few other tweaks that are also worth a mention.
The one part of AutoCAD’s OS that Autodesk is insisting on swing up within the cloud is the Help files, which have been re-structured to produce faster results. For those of you who can’t use online help (or don’t want it) the help file will be available as a separate download and you can set your preference in the options for online or offline help.
The command line has had a charming new face lift. Command options are highlighted in a different color to attract your attention, which can be clicked instead of typed. The Command-Line itself can be dragged off from the screen edge and used in a semi-transparent mode to enhance your use of ‘screen real estate’. Scripts and Lisp programs can be run directly from the command line.
One of the great tools, the properties palette, has received an extra lift. When you hover over options in the properties palette, you can see an instant preview of the changes live on screen – before you commit.
Point cloud tools are now improved, with new tools to sort and manipulate the Point cloud data, and the ability to bring point cloud scans directly into AutoCAD.
The dynamic array tool set that was introduced in AutoCAD 2012 has received a couple of tweaks to enhance usability and also the context sensitive ribbon hatching controls now enable you to operate on multiple hatches at once. Finally, External reference paths can be directly edited in the Xref editor palette, which will save a few steps when your colleagues play ‘Hide the reference’.
The Cloud – External:
Autodesk continue to improve AutoCAD’s abilities to make use of Cloud computing. In AutoCAD 2013 you have the ability to sync and save your files directly to your Autodesk Cloud account, making it easy to access your file from AutoCAD WS or sync files between your laptop and desktop (No need to use Drop Box!).
Additionally, you can use the Autodesk cloud to sync your preferences, to keep your favorite settings the same on multiple computers.
This could be a blessing and a curse to CAD managers. Many companies will not want users saving sensitive data into the cloud, and then ‘taking it home’ with them. However Autodesk Cloud synchronise also provides you the choice to upload support files like fonts, hatch patterns and tool palettes to the cloud that might be a wonderful tool for anyone who has to enforce CAD standards. All of these settings can now be controlled by a new ‘CAD manager control utility’.
The Cloud – Internal
AutoCAD 2013 came with a new update to Content explorer. You are now able deploy the Content explorer ‘crawler’ on local storage drives ( i.e. your colleagues machines) also as your network server. Your Content is crawled and will be delivered up to you via the Content explorer palette.
This could be an extremely powerful tool, particularly in a company like ours where data management consists of the equivalent of rummaging around in your pockets mumbling ‘I’m sure I have it here somewhere’.
Product Keys:
AutoCAD 2013
001E1
AutoCAD Architecture 2013
185E1
AutoCAD Civil 3D 2013
237E1
AutoCAD Design Suite Premium 2013
768E1
AutoCAD Design Suite Standard 2013
767E1
AutoCAD Design Suite Ultimate 2013
769E1
AutoCAD ecscad 2013
![]()
562E1
AutoCAD Electrical 2013
225E1
AutoCAD for Mac 2013
777E1
AutoCAD Inventor LT Suite 2013
596E1
AutoCAD LT 2013
057E1
AutoCAD LT Civil Suite 2013
545E1
AutoCAD LT for Mac 2013
827E1
AutoCAD Map 3D 2013
129E1
AutoCAD Mechanical 2013
206E1
AutoCAD MEP 2013
235E1
AutoCAD OEM 2013
140E1
AutoCAD P&ID 2013
448E1
AutoCAD Plant 3D 2013
426E1
AutoCAD Raster Design 2013
340E1
AutoCAD Revit Architecture Suite 2013
241E1
AutoCAD Revit MEP Suite 2013
257E1
AutoCAD Revit Structure Suite 2013
256E1
AutoCAD Revit LT Suite 2013
![]()
834E1
AutoCAD Utility Design 2013
213E1
Autodesk 3ds Max 2013
128E1
Autodesk 3ds Max Design 2013
495E1
Autodesk 3ds Max Entertainment Creation Suite Premium 2013
774E1
System Requirement:
The Project Scandium technology preview has returned:It is compatible with Autodesk Simulation Moldflow 2013. I have made the 64-bit download available on the Autodesk Labs site. I have the 32-bit version if anyone wants it, but my guess is that most early adopters are using 64-bit.Capabilities in this technology preview beyond the commercial release:. New capability to analyze molds with conformal cooling channels. Hi Scott,I have just started to use Scandium to simulate polymer flow at the microscale by choosing the 'slip' option.
I have a few questions. I assume this is proprietary, but I have to ask since it would benefit my research greatly. Without giving too much away, do you know what model is used for the wall-slip condition? Another property a the microscale is size dependent viscosity. Are you guys considering tackling that issue at any time in the near future?
Thanks, Scott!-John Rodgers (Research Assistant at Lehigh University). Hello John,I think it is necessary to be clear whether we are talking about hydrostatic pressure or pressure drop (or pressure gradient).When I said that slip occurs below a certain pressure, I was refering to the local hydrostatic pressure. More exactly, we should be talking about the normal stress at the wall. That is, the force which is pushing the polymer onto the cavity wall. I think you can understand that if the normal stress (hydrostatic pressure) is higher, then the adhesion to the wall will be stronger. If there is almost no pressure, then the material can slip easily along the wall.When you mention pressure, I think you are actually referring to the injection pressure, or the amount of pressure drop from the injection point to the flow front (where the pressure is zero). This pressure drop can also be related as the presssure gradient over the flow length.
It is the pressure gradient which determines the wall shear stress and this is what determines the degree of molecular alignment. You are right to mention this, and a friction model with a friction coefficient would multiply the friction coefficient by the wall shear stress to get the traction force at the wall.The slip model we have implemented so far in Scandium is much simpler that this.
It is just a free slip model, which means that we assume zero traction force while slip is occuring (that is a friction coefficient of zero) and it assumes an infinite traction force (no slip) when the conditions for no slip are met. The conditions for no slip are that the local (hydrostatic) pressure is above the pressure threshold, or that the local temperautre is below a temperature thresold. (That is, if the pressure is so high that the polymer is pushed hard onto the cavity wall, or the temperature is so low that the polymer has solidified).We hope at some stage to add a friction coefficient to the wall slip model in Scandium.Thanks for the question.regardsFranco. Respected Dr Costa,I have an question based on you are reply(That is, if the pressure is so high that the polymer is pushed hard onto the cavity wall, or the temperature is so low that the polymer has solidified)how to decide the pressure threshold and Temp. Threshold values in Free silp assumption?For the venting analysis how exactly is the air pressure calcuted is it included in the equations during flow and pack solver?
May be in furture versions will it be possible to watch where exactly the traped air is going or it is traped inside the cavity? Hello Sadashiv,we are still learning what are appropriate threshold values as we gain experience with this technology preview of wall slip. Threshold values which I have found some success with are to set the pressure threshold to 0.1 MPa while the temperature threshold to value much higher than the melt temperature. These setting mean that slip will occur whereever the local pressure is below 0.1 MPa - while no slip occurs whereever the pressure is higher than 0.1 MPa.
(Irrespective of temperature).Regarding venting. Yes, the calculated air pressure acts is included in the calculation of polymer pressure and movement. The air pressure calculation includes the air flow through the vent - and so depends on the size and length of the vent as well as its position. If a pocket of air is trapped with no access to a vent, then the air pressure will continue to rise. If the vent is too small, the air pressure can also rise.
![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |